|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8350 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8350, speed testing of GPUs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) and Adreno 430. This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A57) and Atom x5-Z8350 is quad-core (SoFIA). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as PCMark, 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu 8, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, Vellamo, GFXBench, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Fortnite, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc. After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chipset is better to buy Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 or Atom x5-Z8350 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 810 MSM8994 | 5% |
Atom x5-Z8350 | 4% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 | 38% |
Atom x5-Z8350 | 56% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 810 MSM8994 | 4% |
Atom x5-Z8350 | 3% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 |
Atom x5-Z8350 | Total score | 74144 | 59881 | CPU | 20750 | 16771 | GPU | 28176 | 22756 | MEM | 11867 | 9586 | UX | 13352 | 10778 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 |
Atom x5-Z8350 | Single-Core | 191 | 155 | Multi-Core | 863 | 697 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 |
Atom x5-Z8350 | Frequency | 2000 MHz | 1440 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 20 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A57 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.4-1.9 GHz SoFIA | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 2 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 10 | 14 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 is 28% better than Atom x5-Z8350 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 has -4 more core than Atom x5-Z8350. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 430 | Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 500 MHz | GFloPS | 421.2 | 96 | # of Cores | | 16 | # of Shader Units | 256 | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 16.4 | 12.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 27.2 | 21.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 18.8 | 13.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 13.9 | 9.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 17.9 | 13.2 | Real Racing 3 | 40.8 | 37.1 | Sniper 3D | 35.4 | 33.9 | Need for Speed No Limits | 38.1 | 29.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 35.4 | 33.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 35.4 | 29.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 55 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X10 LTE modem | | Download speed | 450 MBit/s. | 21 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 6 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is better: 6 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 and Atom x5-Z8350, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 SoC Comparisons • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB
Atom x5-Z8350 SoC Comparisons • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Kirin 955 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs MediaTek MT6595M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 • Vs Allwinner A133 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290
| |
|