|
Intel Core i5-7600K vs Intel Core i9-10850K |
|
Processor comparisons 05-02-2023 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-7600K vs Intel Core i9-10850K and understand which is better for games or simple use for programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as 3DMark, PassMark, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, RealBench, SuperPi, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Prime95, PCMark 10, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, Furmark, AIDA64. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10850K or Intel Core i5-7600K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-7600K | 52% |
Core i9-10850K | 57% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-10850K is 8% better than Core i5-7600K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-7600K | 52% |
Core i9-10850K | 56% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.1 | 99.8 | Valorant | 104.6 | 113.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 63.5 | Apex Legends | 98.3 | 106.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 85.1 | Overwatch | 84.7 | 91.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.2 | 78.3 | DOOM Eternal | 52.3 | 56.7 | Warzone | 81.6 | 88.5 | Assassin's Creed | 87.9 | 95.3 | Valheim | 86.8 | 94.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-7600K | 46% |
Core i9-10850K | 36% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-7600K is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10850K since it has less power consumption: 91W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-7600K |
Intel Core i9-10850K | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 179 | 229 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 717 | 2616 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 433 | 536 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1589 | 6318 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 929 | 1367 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3642 | 16820 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-7600K |
Intel Core i9-10850K | Single-Core | 2548 | 3074 | Multi-Core | 6912 | 23350 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-7600K |
Intel Core i9-10850K | Single-Core | 1261 | 1383 | Multi-Core | 3978 | 11578 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-7600K |
Intel Core i9-10850K | Announcement date | March 28, 2017 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Kaby Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 7 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 5.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 4 | 10 | Threads | 4 | 20 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 91 W | 125 W | Memory type | DDR4-2133/2400, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-7600K is 5% better than Core i9-10850K in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10850K has 6 more core than Core i5-7600K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-7600K is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10850K is better: 30 However, it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-7600K and Intel Core i9-10850K before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-7600K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
Intel Core i9-10850K Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|