|
Intel Core i7-12800HL vs AMD EPYC 73F3 |
|
Processor comparisons 30-08-2022 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i7-12800HL vs AMD EPYC 73F3 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing, programming. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, RealBench, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, PCMark 10, SuperPi, 7zip, 3DMark, Furmark, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Blender, MATLAB, UserBenchmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 73F3 or Intel Core i7-12800HL.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-12800HL | 60% |
EPYC 73F3 | 62% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 73F3 is 3% better than Core i7-12800HL. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-12800HL | 57% |
EPYC 73F3 | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.6 | 109.5 | Valorant | 114.3 | 124.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.0 | 69.7 | Apex Legends | 107.4 | 116.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.7 | 93.3 | Overwatch | 92.6 | 100.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.9 | 85.8 | DOOM Eternal | 57.1 | 62.2 | Warzone | 89.1 | 97.0 | Assassin's Creed | 96.0 | 104.5 | Valheim | 94.8 | 103.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-12800HL | 128% |
EPYC 73F3 | 15% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-12800HL is more energy efficient than the EPYC 73F3 since it has less power consumption: 45W vs. 240W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-12800HL |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 448 | 125 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3274 | 5148 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1072 | 234 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 7432 | 10911 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2510 | 577 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 24506 | 28372 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-12800HL |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | Single-Core | 5878 | 1297 | Multi-Core | 34310 | 41617 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-12800HL |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | Single-Core | 1738 | 1147 | Multi-Core | 12317 | 21059 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-12800HL |
AMD EPYC 73F3 | Announcement date | September 28, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Embedded | Server | Socket | FCBGA1744 | SP3 | Core name | Alder Lake | Milan | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | Generation | 12 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Cores | 14 | 16 | Threads | 20 | 32 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 10200 millions | 54000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 240 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| 100-000000321 100-100000321WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 73F3 is 31% better than Core i7-12800HL in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 73F3 has 2 more core than Core i7-12800HL. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-12800HL is better: 12
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 73F3 is better: 22 However, it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-12800HL and AMD EPYC 73F3 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-12800HL Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX
AMD EPYC 73F3 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|