|
Intel Core i3-1000NG4 vs AMD Athlon 300GE |
|
Processor comparisons 15-01-2022 If there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i3-1000NG4 vs AMD Athlon 300GE and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, video editing, streaming, machine learning. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, 3DMark, Handbrake, Blender, Blender, PassMark, SuperPi, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Gears 5, 7zip, MATLAB, RealBench, UserBenchmark, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Athlon 300GE or Intel Core i3-1000NG4.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-1000NG4 | 51% |
Athlon 300GE | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-1000NG4 | 51% |
Athlon 300GE | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.5 | 90.2 | Valorant | 102.9 | 102.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.6 | 57.4 | Apex Legends | 96.7 | 96.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.2 | 76.9 | Overwatch | 83.3 | 83.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.0 | 70.7 | DOOM Eternal | 51.4 | 51.3 | Warzone | 80.2 | 80.0 | Assassin's Creed | 86.4 | 86.1 | Valheim | 85.4 | 85.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-1000NG4 | 407% |
Athlon 300GE | 89% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1000NG4 is more energy efficient than the Athlon 300GE since it has less power consumption: 9W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-1000NG4 |
AMD Athlon 300GE | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 142 | 89 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 326 | 471 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 348 | 225 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 612 | 1027 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 576 | 580 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2236 | 2791 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1000NG4 |
AMD Athlon 300GE | Single-Core | 1967 | 2097 | Multi-Core | 4473 | 4919 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-1000NG4 |
AMD Athlon 300GE | Single-Core | 1099 | 942 | Multi-Core | 2487 | 2187 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-1000NG4 |
AMD Athlon 300GE | Announcement date | July 07, 2020 | July 07, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | BGA1526 | AM4 | Core name | Ice Lake | Picasso | Architecture | x86 | Zen+ | Generation | 10 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | | Frequency | 1.1 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 2 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2600 millions | 2200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 35 W | Memory type | LPDDR4-3733 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2667 | Memory bandwidth | 58.3 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 192KB | L2 cache | | 1MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| YD30GEC6M2OFH
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Athlon 300GE is 67% better than Core i3-1000NG4 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1000NG4 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon 300GE is better: 12 However, it should be understood that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-1000NG4 and AMD Athlon 300GE before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-1000NG4 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
AMD Athlon 300GE Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K
| |
|