 |
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Apple M1 Pro |
|
Processor comparisons 13-02-2023 For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX vs Apple M1 Pro and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, streaming, rendering, video editing, programming. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as VeraCrypt, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Prime95, PassMark, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, 3DMark, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, RealBench, Furmark, WPrime, MATLAB. Gaming performance of processors in: - Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Apple M1 Pro or AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 9 7945HX | 65% |
M1 Pro | 59% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 9 7945HX is 9% better than M1 Pro. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 9 7945HX | 61% |
M1 Pro | 57% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 108.7 | 101.0 | Valorant | 123.5 | 114.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.2 | 64.3 | Apex Legends | 116.1 | 107.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 92.7 | 86.1 | Overwatch | 100.1 | 93.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.2 | 79.2 | DOOM Eternal | 61.8 | 57.4 | Warzone | 96.4 | 89.5 | Assassin's Creed | 103.8 | 96.4 | Valheim | 102.5 | 95.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 9 7945HX | 127% |
M1 Pro | 358% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Pro is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 9 7945HX since it has less power consumption: 55W vs. 16W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
Apple M1 Pro | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 298 | 304 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4702 | 1716 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 698 | 590 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11228 | 2936 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1764 | 2233 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30836 | 11512 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
Apple M1 Pro | Single-Core | 3721 | 5046 | Multi-Core | 49724 | 32596 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
Apple M1 Pro | Single-Core | 2104 | 1723 | Multi-Core | 20310 | 12737 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX |
Apple M1 Pro | Announcement date | January 27, 2023 | October 07, 2021 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FL1 | M1 | Core name | Dragon Range | 8x Firestorm and 2x Icestorm | Architecture | Zen 4 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 5 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 16 | 10 | Threads | 32 | 10 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 12600 millions | 34000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 55 W | 16 W | Memory type | DDR5 | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 5200 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | | 208 GByte/s | L1 cache | 1MB | 4MB | L2 cache | 16MB | 24MB | L3 cache | 64MB | 24MB | Overclocking | Yes | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000870
| APL1103 | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 Pro is 21% better than Ryzen 9 7945HX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 9 7945HX has 6 more core than M1 Pro. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Pro is better: 10 However, it should be realized that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Apple M1 Pro before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Apple M1 Pro Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|