 |
Intel Core i7-8569U vs Intel Core i7-9700TE |
|
Processor comparisons 18-01-2022
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i7-8569U vs Intel Core i7-9700TE tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning, rendering. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as RealBench, MATLAB, WPrime, Blender, Prime95, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Gears 5, SuperPi, Furmark, 7zip, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Handbrake, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator.
And how good the processors are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-9700TE or Intel Core i7-8569U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-8569U | 52% |
Core i7-9700TE | 53% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-9700TE is 1% better than Core i7-8569U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-8569U | 52% |
Core i7-9700TE | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.7 | 94.0 | | Valorant | 105.4 | 106.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.0 | 59.8 | | Apex Legends | 99.0 | 100.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.0 | 80.2 | | Overwatch | 85.3 | 86.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.7 | 73.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.7 | 53.4 | | Warzone | 82.2 | 83.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.5 | 89.8 | | Valheim | 87.5 | 88.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-8569U | 143% |
Core i7-9700TE | 100% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8569U is more energy efficient than the Core i7-9700TE since it has less power consumption: 28W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8569U |
Intel Core i7-9700TE | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 190 | 171 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 947 | 1020 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 412 | 552 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1802 | 2287 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1157 | 1420 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5762 | 5783 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8569U |
Intel Core i7-9700TE | | Single-Core | 2857 | 2341 | | Multi-Core | 9278 | 10613 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8569U |
Intel Core i7-9700TE | | Single-Core | 1203 | 1059 | | Multi-Core | 4632 | 5928 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8569U |
Intel Core i7-9700TE | | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | July 07, 2019 | | Type | Laptop | Embedded | | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCLGA1151 | | Core name | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 8 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 1.8 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 1900 millions | 5600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 28 W | 35 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-8569U is 35% better than Core i7-9700TE in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-9700TE has 4 more core than Core i7-8569U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8569U is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-9700TE is better: 24
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-8569U and Intel Core i7-9700TE before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-8569U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i7-9700TE Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
|
|
|
