|
Intel Core i7-5820K vs Intel Core i5-10600KF |
|
Processor comparisons 05-02-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-5820K vs Intel Core i5-10600KF and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, programming, rendering, streaming. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Furmark, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, MATLAB, PassMark, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, PCMark 10, AIDA64, SuperPi, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Prime95, Gears 5. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Valorant
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10600KF or Intel Core i7-5820K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-5820K | 52% |
Core i5-10600KF | 54% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-10600KF is 3% better than Core i7-5820K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-5820K | 53% |
Core i5-10600KF | 54% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 94.6 | 96.5 | Valorant | 107.5 | 109.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.2 | 61.4 | Apex Legends | 101.0 | 103.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.6 | 82.2 | Overwatch | 87.1 | 88.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.2 | 75.6 | DOOM Eternal | 53.7 | 54.8 | Warzone | 83.8 | 85.5 | Assassin's Creed | 90.3 | 92.1 | Valheim | 89.2 | 91.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-5820K | 26% |
Core i5-10600KF | 38% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-10600KF is more energy efficient than the Core i7-5820K as it consumes less power: 140W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
Intel Core i5-10600KF | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 139 | 215 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1085 | 1615 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 329 | 501 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2301 | 3629 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 795 | 1391 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5700 | 10489 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
Intel Core i5-10600KF | Single-Core | 2033 | 2993 | Multi-Core | 9761 | 14785 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
Intel Core i5-10600KF | Single-Core | 1103 | 1425 | Multi-Core | 6470 | 8301 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-5820K |
Intel Core i5-10600KF | Announcement date | September 13, 2014 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Haswell E | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 5 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Cores | 6 | 6 | Threads | 12 | 12 | Bus rate | 0 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 4130 millions | 2460 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 140 W | 125 W | Memory type | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 15 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-10600KF is 19% better than Core i7-5820K in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-5820K is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10600KF is better: 29 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-5820K and Intel Core i5-10600KF before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-5820K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
Intel Core i5-10600KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
| |
|