|
Intel Core i5-10600KF vs Intel Core i9-9900 |
|
Processor comparisons 24-03-2021 Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-10600KF vs Intel Core i9-9900 and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, video editing, programming, rendering. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Blender, PCMark 10, 3DMark, RealBench, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, Furmark, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, MATLAB, 7zip, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15). Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-9900 or Intel Core i5-10600KF.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-10600KF | 54% |
Core i9-9900 | 55% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-9900 is 1% better than Core i5-10600KF. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-10600KF | 54% |
Core i9-9900 | 55% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 96.5 | 97.1 | Valorant | 109.6 | 110.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.4 | 61.8 | Apex Legends | 103.0 | 103.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.2 | 82.8 | Overwatch | 88.8 | 89.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.6 | 76.1 | DOOM Eternal | 54.8 | 55.2 | Warzone | 85.5 | 86.1 | Assassin's Creed | 92.1 | 92.7 | Valheim | 91.0 | 91.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-10600KF | 38% |
Core i9-9900 | 74% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-9900 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-10600KF since it has less power consumption: 125W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
Intel Core i9-9900 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 215 | 219 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1615 | 1931 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 501 | 518 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3629 | 4346 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1391 | 1284 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10489 | 12205 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
Intel Core i9-9900 | Single-Core | 2993 | 2864 | Multi-Core | 14785 | 17110 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
Intel Core i9-9900 | Single-Core | 1425 | 1454 | Multi-Core | 8301 | 8933 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-10600KF |
Intel Core i9-9900 | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1151-2 | Core name | Comet Lake | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Cores | 6 | 8 | Threads | 12 | 16 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 8600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 125 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-10600KF is 24% better than Core i9-9900 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-9900 has 2 more core than Core i5-10600KF. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10600KF is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-9900 is better: 25 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-10600KF and Intel Core i9-9900 before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-10600KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
Intel Core i9-9900 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|