 |
Intel Core i7-5820K vs Intel Core i5-8600K |
|
Processor comparisons 05-02-2023
For example there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-5820K vs Intel Core i5-8600K and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as 7zip, MATLAB, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Blender, Blender, 3DMark, Prime95, PassMark, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-8600K or Intel Core i7-5820K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-5820K | 52% |
Core i5-8600K | 53% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-8600K is 1% better than Core i7-5820K. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-5820K | 53% |
Core i5-8600K | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 94.6 | 93.9 | | Valorant | 107.5 | 106.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.2 | 59.7 | | Apex Legends | 101.0 | 100.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.6 | 80.0 | | Overwatch | 87.1 | 86.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.2 | 73.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.7 | 53.3 | | Warzone | 83.8 | 83.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.3 | 89.6 | | Valheim | 89.2 | 88.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-5820K | 26% |
Core i5-8600K | 41% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-8600K is more energy efficient than the Core i7-5820K since it has less power consumption: 140W vs. 95W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
Intel Core i5-8600K | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 139 | 183 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1085 | 1040 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 329 | 406 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2301 | 2181 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 795 | 1318 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5700 | 7339 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
Intel Core i5-8600K | | Single-Core | 2033 | 2600 | | Multi-Core | 9761 | 10237 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
Intel Core i5-8600K | | Single-Core | 1103 | 1191 | | Multi-Core | 6470 | 5753 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-5820K |
Intel Core i5-8600K | | Announcement date | September 13, 2014 | October 12, 2017 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA1151 | | Core name | Haswell E | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 5 | 8 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 4.3 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 6 | 6 | | Threads | 12 | 6 | | Bus rate | 0 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 4130 millions | 2460 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 140 W | 95 W | | Memory type | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 15 MB | 9 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-8600K is 8% better than Core i7-5820K in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-5820K is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-8600K is better: 16
However, it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-5820K and Intel Core i5-8600K before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-5820K Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 1500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
Intel Core i5-8600K Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-9700TE
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-9700T
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i7-10710U
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-8500B
• Vs Core i5-9600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i7-8569U
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
|
|
|
