|
Intel Core i7-5820K vs Intel Core i3-12100F |
|
Processor comparisons 05-02-2023 Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-5820K vs Intel Core i3-12100F tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, programming, streaming, rendering, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PassMark, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, Gears 5, MATLAB, WPrime, AIDA64, 7zip, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, SuperPi, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, PCMark 10, Blender. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-12100F or Intel Core i7-5820K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-5820K | 52% |
Core i3-12100F | 56% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-12100F is 7% better than Core i7-5820K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-5820K | 53% |
Core i3-12100F | 53% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 94.6 | 94.5 | Valorant | 107.5 | 107.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.2 | 60.1 | Apex Legends | 101.0 | 100.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.6 | 80.5 | Overwatch | 87.1 | 86.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.2 | 74.1 | DOOM Eternal | 53.7 | 53.7 | Warzone | 83.8 | 83.7 | Assassin's Creed | 90.3 | 90.2 | Valheim | 89.2 | 89.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-5820K | 26% |
Core i3-12100F | 99% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-12100F is more energy efficient than the Core i7-5820K as it consumes less power: 140W vs. 58W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
Intel Core i3-12100F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 139 | 267 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1085 | 1958 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 329 | 642 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2301 | 4447 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 795 | 1503 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5700 | 14658 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
Intel Core i3-12100F | Single-Core | 2033 | 3516 | Multi-Core | 9761 | 20521 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
Intel Core i3-12100F | Single-Core | 1103 | 1729 | Multi-Core | 6470 | 6333 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-5820K |
Intel Core i3-12100F | Announcement date | September 13, 2014 | January 07, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Haswell E | Alder Lake-U | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 5 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 4.3 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 1 MHz | Cores | 6 | 4 | Threads | 12 | 8 | Bus rate | 0 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 4130 millions | 9800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 140 W | 58 W | Memory type | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 5 MB | L3 cache | 15 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-5820K is 69% better than Core i3-12100F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-5820K has 2 more core than Core i3-12100F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-5820K is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-12100F is better: 19 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-5820K and Intel Core i3-12100F before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-5820K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
Intel Core i3-12100F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|