|
Intel Core i7-5820K vs AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
|
Processor comparisons 05-02-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i7-5820K vs AMD Ryzen 7 1700 and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as 7zip, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, SuperPi, AIDA64, RealBench, Blender, VeraCrypt, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, PCMark 10, Handbrake, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, WPrime, Blender. And how good the processors are in games: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 1700 or Intel Core i7-5820K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-5820K | 52% |
Ryzen 7 1700 | 54% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 1700 is 3% better than Core i7-5820K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-5820K | 53% |
Ryzen 7 1700 | 54% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 94.6 | 95.3 | Valorant | 107.5 | 108.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.2 | 60.6 | Apex Legends | 101.0 | 101.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.6 | 81.2 | Overwatch | 87.1 | 87.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.2 | 74.7 | DOOM Eternal | 53.7 | 54.1 | Warzone | 83.8 | 84.5 | Assassin's Creed | 90.3 | 91.0 | Valheim | 89.2 | 89.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-5820K | 26% |
Ryzen 7 1700 | 49% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 1700 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-5820K as it consumes less power: 140W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 139 | 151 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1085 | 1403 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 329 | 331 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2301 | 3189 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 795 | 954 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5700 | 8065 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | Single-Core | 2033 | 1968 | Multi-Core | 9761 | 14629 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | Single-Core | 1103 | 972 | Multi-Core | 6470 | 7152 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-5820K |
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | Announcement date | September 13, 2014 | March 02, 2017 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA2011-3 | AM4 | Core name | Haswell E | Summit Ridge | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 5 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.7 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3 MHz | Cores | 6 | 8 | Threads | 12 | 16 | Bus rate | 0 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 4130 millions | 3200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 140 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2667 | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 768KB | L2 cache | | 4MB | L3 cache | 15 MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YD1700BBM88AE YD1700BBAEBOX YD1700BBAEMPK
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-5820K is 9% better than Ryzen 7 1700 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 7 1700 has 2 more core than Core i7-5820K. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-5820K is better: 8
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 1700 is better: 30 Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-5820K and AMD Ryzen 7 1700 before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-5820K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
| |
|