|
Intel Core i7-5820K vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|
Processor comparisons 05-02-2023 If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-5820K vs AMD Ryzen 5 1600 and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Gears 5, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Furmark, AIDA64, PassMark, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, Prime95, 3DMark, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2. And how good the processors are in games: - Overwatch
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 1600 or Intel Core i7-5820K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-5820K | 52% |
Ryzen 5 1600 | 53% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 1600 is 1% better than Core i7-5820K. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-5820K | 53% |
Ryzen 5 1600 | 53% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Control, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 94.6 | 93.8 | Valorant | 107.5 | 106.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.2 | 59.7 | Apex Legends | 101.0 | 100.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.6 | 79.9 | Overwatch | 87.1 | 86.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.2 | 73.6 | DOOM Eternal | 53.7 | 53.3 | Warzone | 83.8 | 83.1 | Assassin's Creed | 90.3 | 89.5 | Valheim | 89.2 | 88.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-5820K | 26% |
Ryzen 5 1600 | 47% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 1600 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-5820K since it has less power consumption: 140W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 139 | 147 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1085 | 1094 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 329 | 357 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2301 | 2501 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 795 | 900 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5700 | 6230 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | Single-Core | 2033 | 2063 | Multi-Core | 9761 | 12340 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-5820K |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | Single-Core | 1103 | 932 | Multi-Core | 6470 | 5690 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-5820K |
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | Announcement date | September 13, 2014 | April 11, 2017 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA2011-3 | AM4 | Core name | Haswell E | Summit Ridge | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 5 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 6 | 6 | Threads | 12 | 12 | Bus rate | 0 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 4130 millions | 2800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 140 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2667 | Memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | | L1 cache | | 576KB | L2 cache | | 3MB | L3 cache | 15 MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YD1600BBM6IAE YD1600BBAEBOX YD1600BBAEMPK
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-5820K is 3% better than Ryzen 5 1600 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-5820K is better: 19
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 1600 is better: 16 Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-5820K and AMD Ryzen 5 1600 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-5820K Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i3-7100 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
| |
|