|
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 vs Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|
Processor comparisons 08-02-2023 If there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 vs Intel Core i9-13900KS and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, streaming, rendering, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Blender, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, MATLAB, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Gears 5, 7zip, WPrime, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-13900KS or AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 | 55% |
Core i9-13900KS | 73% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900KS is 24% better than Ryzen 5 PRO 5645. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 | 54% |
Core i9-13900KS | 66% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.4 | 117.3 | Valorant | 108.4 | 133.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.7 | 74.6 | Apex Legends | 101.9 | 125.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.3 | 99.9 | Overwatch | 87.8 | 107.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.8 | 91.9 | DOOM Eternal | 54.2 | 66.6 | Warzone | 84.6 | 103.9 | Assassin's Creed | 91.1 | 111.9 | Valheim | 90.0 | 110.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 | 91% |
Core i9-13900KS | 71% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900KS since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 237 | 631 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1768 | 6774 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 557 | 1056 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 3929 | 15135 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1424 | 3757 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 10787 | 43688 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | Single-Core | 3054 | 3134 | Multi-Core | 19015 | 76304 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | Single-Core | 1775 | 2675 | Multi-Core | 7253 | 28679 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | Announcement date | September 20, 2022 | October 12, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Vermeer | Raptor Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 5 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 5.9 MHz | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Cores | 6 | 24 | Threads | 12 | 32 | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 4600 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | Memory type | DDR4 | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 3MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 16MB | 36 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | 100-000000833
| Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900KS is 17% better than Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900KS has 18 more core than Ryzen 5 PRO 5645. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900KS is better: 36 However, it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 and Intel Core i9-13900KS before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Intel Core i9-13900KS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|