 |
Intel Core i5-1335U vs Intel Core i9-10880H |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-1335U vs Intel Core i9-10880H tests and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, 7zip, WPrime, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, AIDA64, 3DMark, Prime95, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, Blender, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10880H or Intel Core i5-1335U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-1335U | 55% |
Core i9-10880H | 54% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-1335U is 1% better than Core i9-10880H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-1335U | 54% |
Core i9-10880H | 54% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 96.5 | 95.8 | | Valorant | 109.7 | 108.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.4 | 61.0 | | Apex Legends | 103.1 | 102.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.3 | 81.6 | | Overwatch | 88.8 | 88.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75.7 | 75.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.8 | 54.4 | | Warzone | 85.5 | 84.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 92.1 | 91.4 | | Valheim | 91.0 | 90.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-1335U | 321% |
Core i9-10880H | 92% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-1335U is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10880H since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-1335U |
Intel Core i9-10880H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 243 | 203 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1836 | 1506 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 596 | 469 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4181 | 3372 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1405 | 1052 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13805 | 10194 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1335U |
Intel Core i9-10880H | | Single-Core | 3304 | 2804 | | Multi-Core | 19329 | 15355 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-1335U |
Intel Core i9-10880H | | Single-Core | 1446 | 1250 | | Multi-Core | 8344 | 7637 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-1335U |
Intel Core i9-10880H | | Announcement date | January 16, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.6 MHz | 4.8 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 8 | | Threads | 12 | 16 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-1335U is 32% better than Core i9-10880H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-1335U has 2 more core than Core i9-10880H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-1335U is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10880H is better: 4
However, it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-1335U and Intel Core i9-10880H before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-1335U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
Intel Core i9-10880H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13905H
|
|
|
