|
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G vs Intel Core i7-10750H |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen 3 3200G vs Intel Core i7-10750H and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, programming, video editing, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Blender, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, RealBench, MATLAB, PassMark, Gears 5, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, WPrime, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, Prime95, AIDA64. Gaming performance of processors in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-10750H or AMD Ryzen 3 3200G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 3 3200G | 52% |
Core i7-10750H | 53% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-10750H is 1% better than Ryzen 3 3200G. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 3 3200G | 52% |
Core i7-10750H | 53% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.6 | 94.5 | Valorant | 104.1 | 107.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.3 | 60.2 | Apex Legends | 97.8 | 101.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.1 | 80.6 | Overwatch | 84.3 | 87.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.8 | 74.1 | DOOM Eternal | 52.0 | 53.7 | Warzone | 81.2 | 83.8 | Assassin's Creed | 87.4 | 90.2 | Valheim | 86.4 | 89.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 3 3200G | 54% |
Core i7-10750H | 93% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-10750H is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 3 3200G since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
Intel Core i7-10750H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 154 | 204 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 605 | 1216 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 390 | 484 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1481 | 2732 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 960 | 1174 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3934 | 7314 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
Intel Core i7-10750H | Single-Core | 2252 | 2718 | Multi-Core | 7259 | 12654 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
Intel Core i7-10750H | Single-Core | 1067 | 1257 | Multi-Core | 3525 | 6398 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
Intel Core i7-10750H | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | January 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Picasso | Comet Lake | Architecture | Zen+ | x86 | Generation | 3 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 5 MHz | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 2.6 MHz | Cores | 4 | 6 | Threads | 4 | 12 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 3800 millions | 6800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2933 | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 384KB | | L2 cache | 2MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | Yes | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YD3200C5M4MFH YD3200C5FHBOX YD3200C5FHMPK
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 3 3200G is 27% better than Core i7-10750H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-10750H has 2 more core than Ryzen 3 3200G. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 3200G is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10750H is better: 31 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 3 3200G and Intel Core i7-10750H before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i3-6100 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
Intel Core i7-10750H Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-8700T • Vs Core i5-9600KF • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-6850K • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i7-6500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
| |
|