 |
Intel Core i5-8350U vs Intel Core i7-10750H |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-8350U vs Intel Core i7-10750H tests and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like RealBench, Furmark, 3DMark, Prime95, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, MATLAB, Blender, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Blender, SuperPi, Handbrake.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-10750H or Intel Core i5-8350U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-8350U | 51% |
Core i7-10750H | 53% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-10750H is 3% better than Core i5-8350U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-8350U | 51% |
Core i7-10750H | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 91.4 | 94.5 | | Valorant | 103.9 | 107.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.2 | 60.2 | | Apex Legends | 97.6 | 101.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.9 | 80.6 | | Overwatch | 84.1 | 87.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.7 | 74.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.9 | 53.7 | | Warzone | 81.0 | 83.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 87.2 | 90.2 | | Valheim | 86.2 | 89.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-8350U | 208% |
Core i7-10750H | 93% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-8350U is more energy efficient than the Core i7-10750H as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-8350U |
Intel Core i7-10750H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 167 | 204 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 571 | 1216 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 421 | 484 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1564 | 2732 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 886 | 1174 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3002 | 7314 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-8350U |
Intel Core i7-10750H | | Single-Core | 2083 | 2718 | | Multi-Core | 6398 | 12654 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-8350U |
Intel Core i7-10750H | | Single-Core | 939 | 1257 | | Multi-Core | 3324 | 6398 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-8350U |
Intel Core i7-10750H | | Announcement date | September 24, 2017 | January 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FC-BGA1356 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Kaby Lake R | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 8 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 5 MHz | | Frequency | 1.7 MHz | 2.6 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 6 | | Threads | 8 | 12 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 1700 millions | 6800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-10750H is 34% better than Core i5-8350U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-10750H has 2 more core than Core i5-8350U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-8350U is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10750H is better: 31
Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-8350U and Intel Core i7-10750H before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-8350U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i7-10750H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Core i7-1068NG7
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-8700T
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i7-6500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
|
|
|
