|
Intel Core i5-6500T vs Intel Core i3-9100F |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i5-6500T vs Intel Core i3-9100F and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, rendering, programming, machine learning. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Furmark, PCMark 10, PassMark, Blender, AIDA64, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, MATLAB, 7zip. Gaming performance of processors in: - Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-9100F or Intel Core i5-6500T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-6500T | 51% |
Core i3-9100F | 52% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-9100F is 1% better than Core i5-6500T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-6500T | 51% |
Core i3-9100F | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Control, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.1 | 91.8 | Valorant | 103.5 | 104.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.9 | 58.4 | Apex Legends | 97.3 | 98.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.6 | 78.3 | Overwatch | 83.8 | 84.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.4 | 72.0 | DOOM Eternal | 51.7 | 52.2 | Warzone | 80.7 | 81.4 | Assassin's Creed | 86.9 | 87.7 | Valheim | 85.9 | 86.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-6500T | 83% |
Core i3-9100F | 57% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-6500T is more energy efficient than the Core i3-9100F as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i3-9100F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 132 | 168 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 464 | 660 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 272 | 445 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1030 | 1630 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 724 | 877 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2752 | 3405 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i3-9100F | Single-Core | 1858 | 2502 | Multi-Core | 4857 | 6813 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i3-9100F | Single-Core | 881 | 1130 | Multi-Core | 2994 | 3769 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i3-9100F | Announcement date | September 18, 2015 | April 01, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151-2 | Core name | Skylake | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 6 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 2400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4-2400 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-9100F is 30% better than Core i5-6500T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6500T is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-9100F is better: 28 However, it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-6500T and Intel Core i3-9100F before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-6500T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core i3-9100F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
| |
|