 |
Intel Core i5-6500T vs Intel Core i3-12100 |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-6500T vs Intel Core i3-12100 and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, MATLAB, Prime95, AIDA64, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Gears 5, Blender, SuperPi, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, VeraCrypt, 7zip.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-12100 or Intel Core i5-6500T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-6500T | 51% |
Core i3-12100 | 56% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-12100 is 8% better than Core i5-6500T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-6500T | 51% |
Core i3-12100 | 54% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 91.1 | 96.0 | | Valorant | 103.5 | 109.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.9 | 61.1 | | Apex Legends | 97.3 | 102.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.6 | 81.8 | | Overwatch | 83.8 | 88.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.4 | 75.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.7 | 54.6 | | Warzone | 80.7 | 85.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.9 | 91.7 | | Valheim | 85.9 | 90.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-6500T | 83% |
Core i3-12100 | 96% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-12100 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-6500T as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 60W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i3-12100 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 132 | 267 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 464 | 1958 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 272 | 642 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1030 | 4447 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 724 | 1503 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2752 | 14658 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i3-12100 | | Single-Core | 1858 | 3516 | | Multi-Core | 4857 | 20521 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i3-12100 | | Single-Core | 881 | 1740 | | Multi-Core | 2994 | 7859 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i3-12100 | | Announcement date | September 18, 2015 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Skylake | Alder Lake-U | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 4.3 MHz | | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 1 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 9800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 60 W | | Memory type | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | 5 MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-6500T is 60% better than Core i3-12100 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6500T is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-12100 is better: 30
Although it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-6500T and Intel Core i3-12100 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-6500T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core i3-12100 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i3-6100
• Vs Core i5-6600
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
