 |
Intel Core i5-8265UC vs Intel Core i3-9100F |
|
Processor comparisons 18-01-2022
For example you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-8265UC vs Intel Core i3-9100F and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, machine learning, rendering, programming. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Blender, MATLAB, Blender, 7zip, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Furmark, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, PassMark, RealBench, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PCMark 10, 3DMark, AIDA64.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-9100F or Intel Core i5-8265UC.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-8265UC | 51% |
Core i3-9100F | 52% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-9100F is 1% better than Core i5-8265UC. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-8265UC | 51% |
Core i3-9100F | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 90.8 | 91.8 | | Valorant | 103.2 | 104.4 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.8 | 58.4 | | Apex Legends | 97.0 | 98.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.4 | 78.3 | | Overwatch | 83.6 | 84.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.2 | 72.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.6 | 52.2 | | Warzone | 80.5 | 81.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.7 | 87.7 | | Valheim | 85.6 | 86.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-8265UC | 224% |
Core i3-9100F | 57% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-8265UC is more energy efficient than the Core i3-9100F since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-8265UC |
Intel Core i3-9100F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 157 | 168 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 548 | 660 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 348 | 445 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1507 | 1630 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 896 | 877 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3115 | 3405 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-8265UC |
Intel Core i3-9100F | | Single-Core | 2222 | 2502 | | Multi-Core | 6005 | 6813 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-8265UC |
Intel Core i3-9100F | | Single-Core | 1011 | 1130 | | Multi-Core | 2749 | 3769 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-8265UC |
Intel Core i3-9100F | | Announcement date | November 07, 2018 | April 01, 2019 | | Type | Laptop | Desktop | | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCLGA1151-2 | | Core name | Whiskey Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 8 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 4.2 MHz | | Frequency | 1.6 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 4 | | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 1900 millions | 2400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 65 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2400 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-9100F is 55% better than Core i5-8265UC in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-8265UC is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-9100F is better: 28
However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-8265UC and Intel Core i3-9100F before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-8265UC Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i5-6442EQ
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i3-7350K
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Core i3-9100F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Core i5-6600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
|
|
|
