 |
Intel Core i5-6500T vs Intel Core i7-9700KF |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
If you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i5-6500T vs Intel Core i7-9700KF and decide which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is all information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, AIDA64, Blender, Blender, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Handbrake, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, SuperPi.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-9700KF or Intel Core i5-6500T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-6500T | 51% |
Core i7-9700KF | 54% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-9700KF is 5% better than Core i5-6500T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-6500T | 51% |
Core i7-9700KF | 54% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 91.1 | 96.5 | | Valorant | 103.5 | 109.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.9 | 61.4 | | Apex Legends | 97.3 | 103.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.6 | 82.2 | | Overwatch | 83.8 | 88.8 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.4 | 75.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.7 | 54.8 | | Warzone | 80.7 | 85.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.9 | 92.1 | | Valheim | 85.9 | 91.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-6500T | 83% |
Core i7-9700KF | 48% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-6500T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-9700KF as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 95W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i7-9700KF | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 132 | 214 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 464 | 1520 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 272 | 467 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1030 | 3295 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 724 | 1246 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2752 | 9214 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i7-9700KF | | Single-Core | 1858 | 2977 | | Multi-Core | 4857 | 14718 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i7-9700KF | | Single-Core | 881 | 1376 | | Multi-Core | 2994 | 8311 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i7-9700KF | | Announcement date | September 18, 2015 | April 01, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151-2 | | Core name | Skylake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 4.9 MHz | | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Threads | 4 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 2460 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 95 W | | Memory type | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-9700KF is 30% better than Core i5-6500T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-9700KF has 4 more core than Core i5-6500T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6500T is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-9700KF is better: 29
Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-6500T and Intel Core i7-9700KF before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-6500T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core i7-9700KF Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Core i5-6600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1500X
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
|
|
|
