 |
Intel Core i5-6500T vs Intel Core i5-11400F |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
Let's say you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i5-6500T vs Intel Core i5-11400F and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, rendering, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like WPrime, SuperPi, Blender, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, 7zip, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, MATLAB, Blender, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, RealBench, 3DMark, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11400F or Intel Core i5-6500T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-6500T | 51% |
Core i5-11400F | 55% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-11400F is 7% better than Core i5-6500T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-6500T | 51% |
Core i5-11400F | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Control, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 91.1 | 98.4 | | Valorant | 103.5 | 111.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.9 | 62.6 | | Apex Legends | 97.3 | 105.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.6 | 83.9 | | Overwatch | 83.8 | 90.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.4 | 77.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.7 | 55.9 | | Warzone | 80.7 | 87.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.9 | 93.9 | | Valheim | 85.9 | 92.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-6500T | 83% |
Core i5-11400F | 118% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-11400F is more energy efficient than the Core i5-6500T since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i5-11400F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 132 | 180 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 464 | 1726 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 272 | 421 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1030 | 3865 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 724 | 1099 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2752 | 10233 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i5-11400F | | Single-Core | 1858 | 2451 | | Multi-Core | 4857 | 18669 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i5-11400F | | Single-Core | 881 | 2309 | | Multi-Core | 2994 | 10184 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-6500T |
Intel Core i5-11400F | | Announcement date | September 18, 2015 | January 20, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Skylake | Rocket Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 6 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 2.5 MHz | 2.6 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 6 | | Threads | 4 | 12 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 5400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | | Memory type | DDR4-1866/2133, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.35V | DDR4-3200 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 50 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | 3 MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-11400F is 3% better than Core i5-6500T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-11400F has 2 more core than Core i5-6500T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6500T is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11400F is better: 32
Although it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-6500T and Intel Core i5-11400F before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-6500T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
Intel Core i5-11400F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10900E
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i7-1265UE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i7-1255UL
• Vs Core i5-1235UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UL
• Vs Core i5-1245UE
• Vs Core i3-1220PE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1500X
• Vs Core i3-7100
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
|
|
|
