|
Intel Core i3-9320 vs Intel Core i3-9100F |
|
Processor comparisons 18-01-2022 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-9320 vs Intel Core i3-9100F and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like PassMark, Blender, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, 7zip, Prime95, SuperPi, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Handbrake, PCMark 10. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-9100F or Intel Core i3-9320.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-9320 | 52% |
Core i3-9100F | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-9320 | 52% |
Core i3-9100F | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.3 | 91.8 | Valorant | 104.9 | 104.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 58.4 | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 98.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.7 | 78.3 | Overwatch | 85.0 | 84.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.4 | 72.0 | DOOM Eternal | 52.5 | 52.2 | Warzone | 81.8 | 81.4 | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 87.7 | Valheim | 87.1 | 86.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-9320 | 64% |
Core i3-9100F | 57% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-9320 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-9100F since it has less power consumption: 62W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-9320 |
Intel Core i3-9100F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 182 | 168 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 715 | 660 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 482 | 445 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1766 | 1630 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 950 | 877 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3688 | 3405 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-9320 |
Intel Core i3-9100F | Single-Core | 2738 | 2502 | Multi-Core | 7380 | 6813 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-9320 |
Intel Core i3-9100F | Single-Core | 1206 | 1130 | Multi-Core | 4236 | 3769 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-9320 |
Intel Core i3-9100F | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | April 01, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151-2 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 9 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2400 millions | 2400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 62 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2400 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-9320 is 2% better than Core i3-9100F in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-9320 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-9100F is better: 1 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-9320 and Intel Core i3-9100F before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-9320 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core i3-9100F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
| |
|