|
Intel Core i5-8400T vs Intel Core i3-9100F |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Core i5-8400T vs Intel Core i3-9100F and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, machine learning, rendering, video editing. Here you can find useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as UserBenchmark, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PassMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, RealBench, MATLAB, 7zip, Prime95, Blender, PCMark 10, Blender, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-9100F or Intel Core i5-8400T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-8400T | 52% |
Core i3-9100F | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-8400T | 52% |
Core i3-9100F | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.6 | 91.8 | Valorant | 105.2 | 104.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.9 | 58.4 | Apex Legends | 98.9 | 98.1 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.9 | 78.3 | Overwatch | 85.2 | 84.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.6 | 72.0 | DOOM Eternal | 52.6 | 52.2 | Warzone | 82.1 | 81.4 | Assassin's Creed | 88.4 | 87.7 | Valheim | 87.3 | 86.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-8400T | 91% |
Core i3-9100F | 57% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-8400T is more energy efficient than the Core i3-9100F as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-8400T |
Intel Core i3-9100F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 139 | 168 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 696 | 660 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 387 | 445 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1647 | 1630 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 993 | 877 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3896 | 3405 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-8400T |
Intel Core i3-9100F | Single-Core | 1949 | 2502 | Multi-Core | 7393 | 6813 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-8400T |
Intel Core i3-9100F | Single-Core | 958 | 1130 | Multi-Core | 4499 | 3769 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-8400T |
Intel Core i3-9100F | Announcement date | July 07, 2018 | April 01, 2019 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1151-2 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 9 | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Frequency | 1.7 MHz | 3.6 MHz | Cores | 6 | 4 | Threads | 6 | 4 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 2400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2400 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 37.5 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 9 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-9100F is 52% better than Core i5-8400T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-8400T has 2 more core than Core i3-9100F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-8400T is better: 24
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-9100F is better: 10 Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-8400T and Intel Core i3-9100F before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-8400T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core i3-9100F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
| |
|