 |
Intel Core i5-4690K vs AMD Athlon 320GE |
|
Processor comparisons 01-02-2023
Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i5-4690K vs AMD Athlon 320GE tests and see which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as VeraCrypt, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Gears 5, Blender, 3DMark, Furmark, SuperPi, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Blender, RealBench, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
Gaming performance of processors in: - Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Athlon 320GE or Intel Core i5-4690K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-4690K | 51% |
Athlon 320GE | 51% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-4690K | 52% |
Athlon 320GE | 51% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Control, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 92.2 | 90.3 | | Valorant | 104.7 | 102.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.6 | 57.5 | | Apex Legends | 98.4 | 96.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.5 | 77.0 | | Overwatch | 84.8 | 83.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.3 | 70.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 51.3 | | Warzone | 81.7 | 80.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 88.0 | 86.2 | | Valheim | 86.9 | 85.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-4690K | 44% |
Athlon 320GE | 93% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Athlon 320GE is more energy efficient than the Core i5-4690K as it consumes less power: 88W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-4690K |
AMD Athlon 320GE | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 152 | 93 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 534 | 490 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 351 | 234 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1287 | 1068 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 834 | 603 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2900 | 2903 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-4690K |
AMD Athlon 320GE | | Single-Core | 2211 | 2181 | | Multi-Core | 5590 | 5116 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-4690K |
AMD Athlon 320GE | | Single-Core | 1163 | 980 | | Multi-Core | 4082 | 2274 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-4690K |
AMD Athlon 320GE | | Announcement date | June 24, 2014 | July 07, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1150 | AM4 | | Core name | Devil's Canyon | Picasso | | Architecture | x86 | Zen+ | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | | | Frequency | 3.5 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 2 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | 5 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 2200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 88 W | 35 W | | Memory type | DDR3-1333/1600, DDR3L-1333/1600 @ 1.5V | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 2667 | | Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | 192KB | | L2 cache | | 1MB | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 4MB | | Overclocking | Yes | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| YD32GEC6M2OFH
YD32GEC6FHBOX
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Another difference is that Core i5-4690K has 2 more core than Athlon 320GE. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-4690K is better: 28
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon 320GE is better: 7
However, it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-4690K and AMD Athlon 320GE before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-4690K Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i5-9600
• Vs Core i5-8600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i5-9500F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-9500
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Core i5-8500
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Core i5-8600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-9600KF
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Core i5-6600K
AMD Athlon 320GE Processor Comparisons
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250C
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Athlon PRO 200U
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs 3020e
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Pentium N6415
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150U
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400E
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400T
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i3-8145UE
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i5-10210Y
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i5-7287U
• Vs Core i5-6442EQ
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-8109U
• Vs Core i3-8121U
• Vs Core i3-7350K
• Vs Pentium Gold G6400
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
|
|
|
