 |
Intel Core i7-13700F vs Intel Core i5-12500T |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023
For example there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-13700F vs Intel Core i5-12500T and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning, video editing. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as AIDA64, 7zip, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, Furmark, RealBench, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, SuperPi, Gears 5, WPrime, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-12500T or Intel Core i7-13700F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-13700F | 65% |
Core i5-12500T | 56% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13700F is 13% better than Core i5-12500T. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-13700F | 61% |
Core i5-12500T | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 108.2 | 96.9 | | Valorant | 123.0 | 110.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 68.9 | 61.7 | | Apex Legends | 115.6 | 103.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 92.3 | 82.6 | | Overwatch | 99.6 | 89.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 84.9 | 76.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 61.5 | 55.1 | | Warzone | 95.9 | 85.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 103.3 | 92.5 | | Valheim | 102.1 | 91.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-13700F | 106% |
Core i5-12500T | 155% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-12500T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13700F as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 35W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13700F |
Intel Core i5-12500T | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 462 | 289 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4701 | 2117 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 759 | 694 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10429 | 4807 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2650 | 1623 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 29979 | 15847 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13700F |
Intel Core i5-12500T | | Single-Core | 2424 | 3803 | | Multi-Core | 51087 | 22187 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13700F |
Intel Core i5-12500T | | Single-Core | 2071 | 1634 | | Multi-Core | 19844 | 8748 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13700F |
Intel Core i5-12500T | | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.3 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 6 | | Threads | 24 | 12 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 10200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 35 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 18 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13700F is 19% better than Core i5-12500T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13700F has 10 more core than Core i5-12500T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13700F is better: 33
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-12500T is better: 3
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-13700F and Intel Core i5-12500T before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-13700F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i5-12500T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
|
|
|
