|
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as PassMark, VeraCrypt, 7zip, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, WPrime, Furmark, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, SuperPi, 3DMark, Prime95, PCMark 10. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 or AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | 61% |
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | 54% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is 11% better than Ryzen 5 PRO 2600. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | 57% |
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | 53% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.5 | 94.0 | Valorant | 114.2 | 106.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 63.9 | 59.8 | Apex Legends | 107.3 | 100.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.6 | 80.1 | Overwatch | 92.5 | 86.5 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 78.8 | 73.7 | DOOM Eternal | 57.1 | 53.4 | Warzone | 89.1 | 83.3 | Assassin's Creed | 95.9 | 89.7 | Valheim | 94.8 | 88.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | 91% |
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | 54% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 271 | 172 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3624 | 1347 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 637 | 442 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8279 | 2976 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1735 | 1145 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 22766 | 7928 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | Single-Core | 3335 | 2281 | Multi-Core | 37859 | 13702 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | Single-Core | 1775 | 1059 | Multi-Core | 12233 | 5863 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | Announcement date | January 12, 2021 | April 01, 2018 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | AM4 | AM4 | Core name | Vermeer | Pinnacle Ridge | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | Generation | 5 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 12 | 6 | Threads | 24 | 12 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | 9400 millions | 3600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2933 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | 576KB | L2 cache | 6MB | 3MB | L3 cache | 64MB | 16MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YD260BBBM6IAF YD260BBBAFMPK
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is 11% better than Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 has 6 more core than Ryzen 5 PRO 2600. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is better: 2 However, it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
| |
|