 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 vs Intel Core i3-1125G4 |
|
Processor comparisons 28-02-2023
For example you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 vs Intel Core i3-1125G4 and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as RealBench, Blender, Handbrake, MATLAB, 7zip, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Furmark, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, PCMark 10, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, WPrime.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-1125G4 or Qualcomm Snapdragon 850.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Snapdragon 850 | 51% |
Core i3-1125G4 | 52% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-1125G4 is 1% better than Snapdragon 850. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Snapdragon 850 | 51% |
Core i3-1125G4 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 90.2 | 92.6 | | Valorant | 102.5 | 105.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.4 | 58.9 | | Apex Legends | 96.3 | 98.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.8 | 78.9 | | Overwatch | 83.0 | 85.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.7 | 72.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.2 | 52.6 | | Warzone | 79.9 | 82.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.1 | 88.4 | | Valheim | 85.0 | 87.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Snapdragon 850 | 200% |
Core i3-1125G4 | 196% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Snapdragon 850 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-1125G4 as it consumes less power: 8W vs. 20W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 |
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 84 | 198 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 209 | 778 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 170 | 524 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 350 | 1922 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 485 | 1034 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1347 | 4014 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 |
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | | Single-Core | 596 | 3461 | | Multi-Core | 3792 | 8031 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 |
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | | Single-Core | 482 | 1179 | | Multi-Core | 2115 | 4510 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 |
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | | Announcement date | February 12, 2021 | February 24, 2021 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | Unk | FCBGA1449 | | Core name | Kryo 385 | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | x86 | | Generation | 2 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 4200 millions | 3200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 20 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4266 | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | 1MB | | | L2 cache | 4MB | | | L3 cache | | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 850 is 16% better than Core i3-1125G4 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon 850 has 4 more core than Core i3-1125G4. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1125G4 is better: 27
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 and Intel Core i3-1125G4 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Pentium Silver N6000
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i3-8145U
• Vs Core i3-10110U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i3-1000NG4
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Celeron N5105
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Intel Core i3-1125G4 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i7-8709G
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i5-2500K
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
• Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
|
|
|
