 |
Intel Core i5-2500K vs Intel Core i3-1125G4 |
|
Processor comparisons 05-02-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-2500K vs Intel Core i3-1125G4 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, rendering, programming, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, 7zip, MATLAB, RealBench, Prime95, PCMark 10, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, 3DMark, SuperPi, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark.
And how good the processors are in games: - Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-1125G4 or Intel Core i5-2500K.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-2500K | 51% |
Core i3-1125G4 | 52% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-1125G4 is 1% better than Core i5-2500K. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-2500K | 51% |
Core i3-1125G4 | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 91.5 | 92.6 | | Valorant | 103.9 | 105.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.2 | 58.9 | | Apex Legends | 97.7 | 98.9 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.0 | 78.9 | | Overwatch | 84.2 | 85.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.7 | 72.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 52.0 | 52.6 | | Warzone | 81.1 | 82.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 87.3 | 88.4 | | Valheim | 86.3 | 87.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-2500K | 35% |
Core i3-1125G4 | 196% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-1125G4 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-2500K as it consumes less power: 95W vs. 20W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-2500K |
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 127 | 198 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 461 | 778 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 262 | 524 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 894 | 1922 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 697 | 1034 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2450 | 4014 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-2500K |
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | | Single-Core | 1684 | 3461 | | Multi-Core | 4077 | 8031 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-2500K |
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | | Single-Core | 998 | 1179 | | Multi-Core | 3399 | 4510 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-2500K |
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | | Announcement date | March 11, 2011 | February 24, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Laptop | | Socket | LGA1155 | FCBGA1449 | | Core name | Sandy Bridge | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 2 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 MHz | 3.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 2 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 4 | | Threads | 4 | 8 | | Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 3200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 95 W | 20 W | | Memory type | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-2500K is 39% better than Core i3-1125G4 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-2500K is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-1125G4 is better: 29
Although it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-2500K and Intel Core i3-1125G4 before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-2500K Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Celeron N5105
• Vs Pentium Gold G7400
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Celeron N5100
Intel Core i3-1125G4 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10105
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i5-10400T
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE
• Vs Core i3-11100B
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE
• Vs Core i7-10810U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i3-10300
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i5-9500TE
• Vs Core i5-10400H
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-9850HL
• Vs Core i5-1035G7
• Vs Core i5-1035G4
• Vs Core i5-9500T
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8279U
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i7-8809G
• Vs Core i7-8705G
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i5-8600T
• Vs Core i5-9400H
• Vs Core i7-8559U
• Vs Core i7-8709G
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i5-8500T
• Vs Core i7-8706G
• Vs Core i5-8400H
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
• Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
|
|
|
