 |
Intel Celeron N5105 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5625U |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Celeron N5105 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5625U and decide which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming, video editing. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Blender, 3DMark, PassMark, Handbrake, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Gears 5, Furmark, PCMark 10, Prime95, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, VeraCrypt, GeekBench 6, 5.2.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 5625U or Intel Celeron N5105.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Celeron N5105 | 51% |
Ryzen 5 5625U | 55% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 5 5625U is 7% better than Celeron N5105. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Celeron N5105 | 51% |
Ryzen 5 5625U | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Control, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 90.3 | 94.7 | | Valorant | 102.6 | 107.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.5 | 60.2 | | Apex Legends | 96.5 | 101.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.0 | 80.7 | | Overwatch | 83.1 | 87.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.8 | 74.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.3 | 53.8 | | Warzone | 80.1 | 83.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.2 | 90.4 | | Valheim | 85.2 | 89.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Celeron N5105 | 237% |
Ryzen 5 5625U | 316% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 5 5625U is more energy efficient than the Celeron N5105 since it has less power consumption: 10W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 114 | 220 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 294 | 1648 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 240 | 548 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 710 | 3629 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 515 | 1406 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1881 | 9678 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U | | Single-Core | 1544 | 2882 | | Multi-Core | 3802 | 16668 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U | | Single-Core | 712 | 1425 | | Multi-Core | 2280 | 6543 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Celeron N5105 |
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U | | Announcement date | March 14, 2021 | January 08, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1338 | FP6 | | Core name | Jasper Lake | Barcelo | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3+ | | Generation | 10 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 4.3 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 6 | | Threads | 4 | 12 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 2800 millions | 4800 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4 LPDDR4x | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | 384KB | | L2 cache | | 3MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| 100-000000583
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 5625U is 13% better than Celeron N5105 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 5 5625U has 2 more core than Celeron N5105. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5105 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 5625U is better: 30
Although it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Celeron N5105 and AMD Ryzen 5 5625U before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron N5105 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Core i5-2500K
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10900TE
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i3-1215UL
• Vs Core i3-1215UE
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i5-2500K
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300U
• Vs Athlon Gold 7220U
|
|
|
