 |
Intel Celeron N5105 vs Intel Core i5-6300U |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Celeron N5105 vs Intel Core i5-6300U and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, rendering, video editing, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Handbrake, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, MATLAB, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, RealBench, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, Blender, SuperPi, Furmark, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 7zip, Prime95, 3DMark. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-6300U or Intel Celeron N5105.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Celeron N5105 | 51% |
Core i5-6300U | 50% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Celeron N5105 is 1% better than Core i5-6300U. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Celeron N5105 | 51% |
Core i5-6300U | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Metro Exodus, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.3 | 89.9 | Valorant | 102.6 | 102.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.5 | 57.2 | Apex Legends | 96.5 | 96.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.0 | 76.6 | Overwatch | 83.1 | 82.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.8 | 70.5 | DOOM Eternal | 51.3 | 51.1 | Warzone | 80.1 | 79.6 | Assassin's Creed | 86.2 | 85.8 | Valheim | 85.2 | 84.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Celeron N5105 | 237% |
Core i5-6300U | 175% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N5105 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-6300U as it consumes less power: 10W vs. 15W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
Intel Core i5-6300U | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 114 | 127 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 294 | 281 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 240 | 299 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 710 | 739 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 515 | 777 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1881 | 1834 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
Intel Core i5-6300U | Single-Core | 1544 | 1728 | Multi-Core | 3802 | 3275 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
Intel Core i5-6300U | Single-Core | 712 | 790 | Multi-Core | 2280 | 1817 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Celeron N5105 |
Intel Core i5-6300U | Announcement date | March 14, 2021 | April 01, 2015 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1338 | FCBGA1356 | Core name | Jasper Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 3 MHz | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.4 MHz | Cores | 4 | 2 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2800 millions | 2400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4 LPDDR4x | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 34.1 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 3 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-6300U is 16% better than Celeron N5105 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Celeron N5105 has 2 more core than Core i5-6300U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5105 is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-6300U is better: 12 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Celeron N5105 and Intel Core i5-6300U before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron N5105 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Ryzen 3 3250U • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Core i5-2500K • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
Intel Core i5-6300U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i7-6500U • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
| |
|