 |
Intel Celeron N5105 vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800H |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Celeron N5105 vs AMD Ryzen 7 6800H and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Furmark, Gears 5, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, PCMark 10, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, Blender, RealBench, 7zip.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 7 6800H or Intel Celeron N5105.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Celeron N5105 | 51% |
Ryzen 7 6800H | 57% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 6800H is 10% better than Celeron N5105. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Celeron N5105 | 51% |
Ryzen 7 6800H | 54% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 90.3 | 96.7 | | Valorant | 102.6 | 109.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.5 | 61.6 | | Apex Legends | 96.5 | 103.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.0 | 82.4 | | Overwatch | 83.1 | 89.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.8 | 75.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.3 | 55.0 | | Warzone | 80.1 | 85.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.2 | 92.3 | | Valheim | 85.2 | 91.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Celeron N5105 | 237% |
Ryzen 7 6800H | 113% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N5105 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 7 6800H since it has less power consumption: 10W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 114 | 235 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 294 | 2375 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 240 | 564 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 710 | 5218 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 515 | 1474 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1881 | 13292 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H | | Single-Core | 1544 | 3169 | | Multi-Core | 3802 | 26291 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H | | Single-Core | 712 | 1536 | | Multi-Core | 2280 | 8553 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Celeron N5105 |
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H | | Announcement date | March 14, 2021 | January 09, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1338 | FP7 | | Core name | Jasper Lake | Rembrandt | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3+ | | Generation | 10 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Threads | 4 | 16 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | 2800 millions | 10200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4 LPDDR4x | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | | L1 cache | | 512KB | | L2 cache | | 4MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 16MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| FP7:100-000000545 FP7r2:100-000000561
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 7 6800H is 37% better than Celeron N5105 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 7 6800H has 4 more core than Celeron N5105. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5105 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 6800H is better: 31
Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Celeron N5105 and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Celeron N5105 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Core i5-2500K
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7520U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5560U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
