 |
Intel Celeron N5105 vs Intel Core i7-12650H |
|
Processor comparisons 04-02-2023
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Celeron N5105 vs Intel Core i7-12650H and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, video editing, rendering, programming, streaming. Here you can find all information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Blender, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, PassMark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, SuperPi, WPrime, Gears 5, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, Handbrake, AIDA64, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Furmark.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-12650H or Intel Celeron N5105.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Celeron N5105 | 51% |
Core i7-12650H | 58% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-12650H is 12% better than Celeron N5105. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Celeron N5105 | 51% |
Core i7-12650H | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 90.3 | 98.4 | | Valorant | 102.6 | 111.8 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.5 | 62.6 | | Apex Legends | 96.5 | 105.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.0 | 83.9 | | Overwatch | 83.1 | 90.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.8 | 77.2 | | DOOM Eternal | 51.3 | 55.9 | | Warzone | 80.1 | 87.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 86.2 | 93.9 | | Valheim | 85.2 | 92.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Celeron N5105 | 237% |
Core i7-12650H | 146% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Celeron N5105 is more energy efficient than the Core i7-12650H as it consumes less power: 10W vs. 40W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
Intel Core i7-12650H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 114 | 361 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 294 | 2639 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 240 | 865 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 710 | 5992 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 515 | 2023 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1881 | 19754 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
Intel Core i7-12650H | | Single-Core | 1544 | 4739 | | Multi-Core | 3802 | 27655 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Celeron N5105 |
Intel Core i7-12650H | | Single-Core | 712 | 1755 | | Multi-Core | 2280 | 10216 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Celeron N5105 |
Intel Core i7-12650H | | Announcement date | March 14, 2021 | January 07, 2022 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1338 | FCBGA1744 | | Core name | Jasper Lake | Alder Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 10 | 12 | | Turbo Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 10 | | Threads | 4 | 16 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 10 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 2800 millions | 10200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 40 W | | Memory type | DDR4 LPDDR4x | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5 5200 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 24 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-12650H is 42% better than Celeron N5105 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-12650H has 6 more core than Celeron N5105. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Celeron N5105 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-12650H is better: 32
Although it should be understood that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Celeron N5105 and Intel Core i7-12650H before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Celeron N5105 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Pentium Silver N6005
• Vs Core i5-2500K
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
Intel Core i7-12650H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-12700E
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Core i7-12700TE
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700HE
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13700HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Core i7-1365U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Core i9-13905H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7736U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7535U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7335U
• Vs Ryzen 7 7730U
• Vs Ryzen 5 7530U
• Vs Ryzen 3 7330U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
|
|
|
