|
HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 Well, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T7510, comparison of GPUs Mali-G57 MP6 and PowerVR GM 9446. This performance comparison involves two processors: HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G is gexa-core (ARM Cortex-A76) and Tiger T7510 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A75). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like Geekbench, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, PassMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Octane V2, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, Vellamo, Mozilla Kraken, and how good the chips are in games Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3 etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G or Tiger T7510 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G | 24% |
Tiger T7510 | 17% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G | 78% |
Tiger T7510 | 66% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G | 21% |
Tiger T7510 | 16% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G |
Tiger T7510 | Total score | 345831 | 243859 | CPU | 96840 | 68287 | GPU | 131412 | 92666 | MEM | 55325 | 39007 | UX | 62245 | 43889 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G |
Tiger T7510 | Single-Core | 746 | 503 | Multi-Core | 2536 | 2012 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G |
Tiger T7510 | Frequency | 2360 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 6 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 3x2.22 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x1.84 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4 | Max. Memory | 12 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 1066 | Memory bandwidth | 31.78 | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 256 KB | L2 cache | | 1 MB | L3 cache | | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G is 15% better than Tiger T7510 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G has 2 more core than Tiger T7510. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MP6 | PowerVR GM 9446 | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 846 | 204 | # of Cores | 6 | 3 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.3 | 27.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 57.8 | 31.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 47.7 | 57.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 43.8 | 38.7 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 47.9 | 23.8 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 74.5 | 36.4 | Real Racing 3 | 95.4 | 85.8 | Sniper 3D | 104.9 | 74.4 | Need for Speed No Limits | 76.3 | 103 | Mortal Kombat X | 76.3 | 82.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 62 | 68.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 48 MP | 48 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 24 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Vivi Magic | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | 21 | Ivy V510 5G | Download speed | 7350 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3400 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T7510 is better: 10 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G and Tiger T7510, as well as read the test results at the links below.
HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9825 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36
Tiger T7510 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|