|
AMD Athlon PRO 200U vs Intel Core i5-2400 |
|
Processor comparisons 23-03-2021 If you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD Athlon PRO 200U vs Intel Core i5-2400 and see which is better for games or normal use for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing, rendering. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like MATLAB, 3DMark, Furmark, Blender, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Handbrake, 7zip, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, WPrime, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, PassMark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-2400 or AMD Athlon PRO 200U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Athlon PRO 200U | 51% |
Core i5-2400 | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Athlon PRO 200U | 51% |
Core i5-2400 | 51% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.8 | 90.5 | Valorant | 102.0 | 102.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.1 | 57.6 | Apex Legends | 95.9 | 96.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.5 | 77.2 | Overwatch | 82.6 | 83.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.4 | 71.0 | DOOM Eternal | 51.0 | 51.4 | Warzone | 79.6 | 80.2 | Assassin's Creed | 85.7 | 86.4 | Valheim | 84.7 | 85.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Athlon PRO 200U | 185% |
Core i5-2400 | 26% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Athlon PRO 200U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-2400 since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 95W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Athlon PRO 200U |
Intel Core i5-2400 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 131 | 104 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 366 | 378 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 308 | 267 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 772 | 941 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 489 | 635 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2355 | 2350 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Athlon PRO 200U |
Intel Core i5-2400 | Single-Core | 1748 | 1589 | Multi-Core | 4150 | 3799 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Athlon PRO 200U |
Intel Core i5-2400 | Single-Core | 835 | 756 | Multi-Core | 1728 | 2483 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Athlon PRO 200U |
Intel Core i5-2400 | Announcement date | October 01, 2019 | October 01, 2010 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FP5 | LGA1155 | Core name | Raven Ridge | Sandy Bridge | Architecture | Zen | x86 | Generation | 1 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Frequency | 2.3 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Cores | 2 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 4 | Bus rate | | 5 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm | Transistors count | 1600 millions | 2480 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 95 W | Memory type | | DDR3 1066/1333 | Max. Memory | | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2400 | | Memory bandwidth | | 21 GB/s | L1 cache | 192KB | | L2 cache | 1MB | | L3 cache | 4MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | YM200UC4T2OFB
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-2400 is 25% better than Athlon PRO 200U in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-2400 has 2 more core than Athlon PRO 200U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Athlon PRO 200U is better: 12
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-2400 is better: 25 All the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Athlon PRO 200U and Intel Core i5-2400 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Athlon PRO 200U Processor Comparisons • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Athlon Gold 7220U • Vs Athlon Silver 7120U
Intel Core i5-2400 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Core i5-L16G7 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Core i3-6100
| |
|