|
AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 7763 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023 For example you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 7763 and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Handbrake, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, 7zip, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Blender, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, AIDA64, PassMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, MATLAB, 3DMark, UserBenchmark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7763 or AMD EPYC 7373X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7373X | 62% |
EPYC 7763 | 71% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7763 is 12% better than EPYC 7373X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7373X | 64% |
EPYC 7763 | 62% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.2 | 110.0 | Valorant | 128.6 | 125.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 70.0 | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 117.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 93.8 | Overwatch | 104.2 | 101.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 86.3 | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 62.5 | Warzone | 100.3 | 97.5 | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 105.0 | Valheim | 106.7 | 103.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7373X | 20% |
EPYC 7763 | 15% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7373X is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7763 since it has less power consumption: 240W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 127 | 210 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5200 | 8667 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 237 | 414 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11021 | 21470 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 584 | 970 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28657 | 47776 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Single-Core | 1311 | 2446 | Multi-Core | 42034 | 70081 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Single-Core | 1476 | 1303 | Multi-Core | 24660 | 21589 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Milan | Milan | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 3.05 MHz | 2.45 MHz | Cores | 16 | 64 | Threads | 32 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000508 100-000000508​WOF | 100-000000312 100-100000312WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7373X is 19% better than EPYC 7763 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7763 has 48 more core than EPYC 7373X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7373X is better: 18
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7763 is better: 11 Although it should be realized that all the figures in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD EPYC 7763 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7373X Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7763 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|