|
AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 7663 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023 For example you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 7663 and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, machine learning, video editing, programming, streaming. Here you can find all information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as WPrime, Prime95, AIDA64, 7zip, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, Blender, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, Handbrake, SuperPi, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, RealBench, 3DMark, Gears 5, Furmark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7663 or AMD EPYC 7373X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7373X | 62% |
EPYC 7663 | 68% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7663 is 8% better than EPYC 7373X. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7373X | 64% |
EPYC 7663 | 76% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.2 | 135.1 | Valorant | 128.6 | 153.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 86.0 | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 144.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 115.1 | Overwatch | 104.2 | 124.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 105.9 | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 76.8 | Warzone | 100.3 | 119.7 | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 128.9 | Valheim | 106.7 | 127.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7373X | 20% |
EPYC 7663 | 12% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7373X is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7663 as it consumes less power: 240W vs. 240W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 127 | 184 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5200 | 7606 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 237 | 347 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11021 | 16121 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 584 | 852 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28657 | 41920 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Single-Core | 1311 | 1794 | Multi-Core | 42034 | 61492 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Single-Core | 1476 | 874 | Multi-Core | 24660 | 46160 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7663 | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Milan | Milan | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 3.05 MHz | 2 MHz | Cores | 16 | 56 | Threads | 32 | 112 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 78000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 240 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000508 100-000000508​WOF | 100-000000318 100-100000318WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7373X is 34% better than EPYC 7663 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7663 has 40 more core than EPYC 7373X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7373X is better: 5
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7663 is better: 23 However, it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD EPYC 7663 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7373X Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7663 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|