 |
AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 7352 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 7352 and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, rendering, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, PassMark, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, MATLAB, RealBench, 3DMark, Gears 5, 7zip, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, SuperPi, WPrime, Blender, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7352 or AMD EPYC 7373X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7373X | 62% |
EPYC 7352 | 62% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7373X | 64% |
EPYC 7352 | 59% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.2 | 104.6 | | Valorant | 128.6 | 118.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 66.6 | | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 111.7 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 89.2 | | Overwatch | 104.2 | 96.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 82.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 59.4 | | Warzone | 100.3 | 92.7 | | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 99.9 | | Valheim | 106.7 | 98.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7373X | 20% |
EPYC 7352 | 20% |
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 127 | 113 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5200 | 5016 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 237 | 388 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11021 | 10641 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 584 | 554 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28657 | 27682 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Single-Core | 1311 | 1805 | | Multi-Core | 42034 | 40609 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Single-Core | 1476 | 962 | | Multi-Core | 24660 | 16287 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7352 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | October 01, 2019 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | | Core name | Milan | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 3 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.2 MHz | | Frequency | 3.05 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 24 | | Threads | 32 | 48 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 56000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 155 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 204 GByte/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | 100-000000508
100-000000508​WOF | 100-000000077
100-100000077WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7373X is 24% better than EPYC 7352 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7352 has 8 more core than EPYC 7373X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7373X is better: 25
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7352 is better: 6
However, it should be realized that all the figures in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD EPYC 7352 before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7373X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7352 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
