 |
AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 9334 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023
Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 9334 tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for streaming, video editing, machine learning, programming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like MATLAB, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, VeraCrypt, 7zip, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, PCMark 10, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, PassMark, Handbrake, Prime95, Furmark, Gears 5.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Valorant
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Apex Legends
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9334 or AMD EPYC 7373X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7373X | 62% |
EPYC 9334 | 70% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9334 is 11% better than EPYC 7373X. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7373X | 64% |
EPYC 9334 | 75% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Hitman 3, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 113.2 | 132.6 | | Valorant | 128.6 | 150.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 84.4 | | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 141.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 113.0 | | Overwatch | 104.2 | 122.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 104.0 | | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 75.3 | | Warzone | 100.3 | 117.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 126.6 | | Valheim | 106.7 | 125.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7373X | 20% |
EPYC 9334 | 35% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9334 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7373X as it consumes less power: 240W vs. 210W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9334 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 127 | 156 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5200 | 8366 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 237 | 334 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11021 | 17782 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 584 | 896 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28657 | 46317 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9334 | | Single-Core | 1311 | 2073 | | Multi-Core | 42034 | 67962 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9334 | | Single-Core | 1476 | 2209 | | Multi-Core | 24660 | 43703 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9334 | | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Milan | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 3 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3.05 MHz | 2.7 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 32 | | Threads | 32 | 64 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 210 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 128MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000508
100-000000508​WOF | 100-000000800
100-100000800WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7373X is 11% better than EPYC 9334 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9334 has 16 more core than EPYC 7373X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7373X is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9334 is better: 33
Although it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD EPYC 9334 before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7373X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9334 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
