|
Apple M1 Ultra vs AMD EPYC 7763 |
|
Processor comparisons 21-10-2022 If there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Apple M1 Ultra vs AMD EPYC 7763 and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Handbrake, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Blender, 3DMark, Blender, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, RealBench, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, 7zip, Prime95. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7763 or Apple M1 Ultra.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7763 is 4% better than M1 Ultra. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.1 | 110.0 | Valorant | 128.6 | 125.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 70.0 | Apex Legends | 120.8 | 117.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 93.8 | Overwatch | 104.1 | 101.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 86.3 | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 62.5 | Warzone | 100.3 | 97.5 | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 105.0 | Valheim | 106.7 | 103.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
M1 Ultra | 272% |
EPYC 7763 | 15% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 Ultra is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7763 since it has less power consumption: 20W vs. 280W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Apple M1 Ultra |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 555 | 210 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3252 | 8667 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1103 | 414 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5583 | 21470 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 4240 | 970 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 21959 | 47776 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Ultra |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Single-Core | 9611 | 2446 | Multi-Core | 62194 | 70081 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Apple M1 Ultra |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Single-Core | 1637 | 1303 | Multi-Core | 24642 | 21589 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Apple M1 Ultra |
AMD EPYC 7763 | Announcement date | April 09, 2022 | March 15, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Server | Socket | M1 | SP3 | Core name | 16x Firestorm and 4x Icestorm | Milan | Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Zen 3 | Generation | 1 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 3.2 MHz | 2.45 MHz | Cores | 20 | 64 | Threads | 20 | 128 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 114000 millions | 86000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 20 W | 280 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 - Up to 6400MHz | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 818 GByte/s | 204.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | | L2 cache | 48MB | | L3 cache | 96MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | APL1W06 | 100-000000312 100-100000312WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 Ultra is 23% better than EPYC 7763 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7763 has 44 more core than M1 Ultra. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 Ultra is better: 28
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7763 is better: 8 Although it should be understood that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Apple M1 Ultra and AMD EPYC 7763 before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Apple M1 Ultra Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD EPYC 7763 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|