|
AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 7272 |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 7272 and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming, video editing. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as GeekBench 6, 5.2, RealBench, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Blender, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, AIDA64, Gears 5, MATLAB, SuperPi, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, WPrime, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7272 or AMD EPYC 7373X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7373X | 62% |
EPYC 7272 | 62% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7373X | 64% |
EPYC 7272 | 60% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Control, Battlefield V, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.2 | 106.7 | Valorant | 128.6 | 121.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 67.9 | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 114.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 91.0 | Overwatch | 104.2 | 98.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 83.7 | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 60.6 | Warzone | 100.3 | 94.6 | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 101.9 | Valheim | 106.7 | 100.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7373X | 20% |
EPYC 7272 | 43% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7272 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7373X since it has less power consumption: 240W vs. 120W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7272 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 127 | 395 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5200 | 3819 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 237 | 595 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11021 | 8372 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 584 | 2377 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28657 | 21304 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7272 | Single-Core | 1311 | 3257 | Multi-Core | 42034 | 42125 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7272 | Single-Core | 1476 | 1569 | Multi-Core | 24660 | 18372 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 7272 | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP3 | Core name | Milan | Milan | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 3 | Generation | 3 | 3 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.05 MHz | 2.9 MHz | Cores | 16 | 12 | Threads | 32 | 24 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 42000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 120 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 64MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000000508 100-000000508​WOF | 100-000000079 100-100000079WOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7373X is 4% better than EPYC 7272 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7373X has 4 more core than EPYC 7272. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7373X is better: 24
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7272 is better: 7 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD EPYC 7272 before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7373X Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7272 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|