|
AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 9354P |
|
Processor comparisons 27-03-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD EPYC 9354P and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, machine learning, rendering, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, Handbrake, Blender, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, PassMark, PCMark 10, Furmark, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Gears 5, Prime95, 7zip, MATLAB, RealBench, 3DMark, AIDA64. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9354P or AMD EPYC 7373X.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7373X | 62% |
EPYC 9354P | 70% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9354P is 11% better than EPYC 7373X. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7373X | 64% |
EPYC 9354P | 75% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 113.2 | 132.6 | Valorant | 128.6 | 150.6 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 72.0 | 84.4 | Apex Legends | 120.9 | 141.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 96.4 | 113.0 | Overwatch | 104.2 | 122.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 88.7 | 103.9 | DOOM Eternal | 64.3 | 75.3 | Warzone | 100.3 | 117.5 | Assassin's Creed | 108.0 | 126.5 | Valheim | 106.7 | 125.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7373X | 20% |
EPYC 9354P | 26% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9354P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7373X as it consumes less power: 240W vs. 280W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9354P | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 127 | 170 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 5200 | 8374 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 237 | 350 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 11021 | 17783 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 584 | 911 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 28657 | 46297 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9354P | Single-Core | 1311 | 2087 | Multi-Core | 42034 | 67926 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9354P | Single-Core | 1476 | 2223 | Multi-Core | 24660 | 43685 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7373X |
AMD EPYC 9354P | Announcement date | March 22, 2022 | November 10, 2022 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | Core name | Milan | Genoa | Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 4 | Generation | 3 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.05 MHz | 3.25 MHz | Cores | 16 | 32 | Threads | 32 | 64 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 54000 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 240 W | 280 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | 204.8 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 768MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | 100-000000508 100-000000508​WOF | 100-000000805 100-100000805WOF | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9354P is 6% better than EPYC 7373X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9354P has 16 more core than EPYC 7373X. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7373X is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9354P is better: 32 Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD EPYC 9354P before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7373X Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9354P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9454P • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7542 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|