 |
Mali-G68 MC4 at 800 MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 27-08-2021
Maximum benchmark examination data of Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Neocore, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, PassMark, 3DMark, PCMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Asphalt 9, PUBG, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, GTA, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which GPU is better to buy Mali-G68 MC4 or Apple A12X Bionic.
Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz |
Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 800 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 7 | | Shaders | 128 | 0 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 509737 | 653237 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 12756 | 18183 | | | | | GFloPS | 686 GFloPS | 1360 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 320 MT/s | 610 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 12 GP/s | 15 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch full video of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
