 |
Apple A12X Bionic at 2500 MHz vs Mali-G57 MP5 at 850 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-01-2021
Extreme benchmark testing data of Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz vs Mali-G57 MP5 @ 850MHz, which GPU is better. Full comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as AnTuTu v10, 9, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of GPUs in Madout2, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Call of Duty, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A12X Bionic or Mali-G57 MP5.
Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz vs Mali-G57 MP5 @ 850MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz |
Mali-G57 MP5 @ 850MHz |
| Frequency | 2500 MHz | 850 MHz | | Cores | 7 | 5 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 16 nm | | Antutu v10 | 653237 | 435496 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 18183 | 10212 | | | | | GFloPS | 1360 GFloPS | 705.5 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 610 MT/s | 547 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 15 GP/s | 9.07 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Mali-G57 MP5 @ 850MHz is better: 0
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
