 |
Mali-G715 MP9 at 750 MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic at 2500 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 30-10-2022
Maximum benchmark examination data of Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz, which GPU is better. Comprehensive compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Vellamo, Neocore, PCMark, PassMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, 3DMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, GeekBench 6, 5.2, and how good the GPU are in games PUBG, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Mali-G715 MP9 or Apple A12X Bionic.
Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz vs Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz |
Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz |
| Frequency | 750 MHz | 2500 MHz | | Cores | 9 | 7 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 797642 | 653237 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 22356 | 18183 | | | | | GFloPS | 1354.62 GFloPS | 1360 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 3055 MT/s | 610 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 106.15 GP/s | 15 GP/s | | DirectX | 11 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Mali-G715 MP9 @ 750MHz is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
