 |
Apple A16 Bionic at 3460 MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 14-09-2022
Detailed comparison data of Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Hardcore benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, PCMark, Neocore, 3DMark, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, PassMark, Quadrant, and how good the GPU are in games GTA, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A16 Bionic or Mali-G68 MC4.
Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz |
Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 3460 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 5 | 4 | | Shaders | 0 | 128 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu v10 | 994865 | 509737 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 41258 | 12756 | | | | | GFloPS | 3200 GFloPS | 686 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1320 MT/s | 320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 42 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A16 Bionic @ 3460MHz is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz is better: 1
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
|
|
|
