 |
Apple A12X Bionic at 2500 MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 09-01-2021
Comprehensive comparison data of Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark, PassMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu v10, 9, Quadrant, Neocore, even the gaming performance of GPUs in PUBG, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, GTA, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Apple A12X Bionic or Mali-G77 MC9.
Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz vs Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz |
Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 2500 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 7 | 9 | | Shaders | 0 | 0 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Antutu v10 | 653237 | 537882 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 18183 | 12878 | | | | | GFloPS | 1360 GFloPS | 504 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 610 MT/s | 1246 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 15 GP/s | 46 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 11 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A12X Bionic @ 2500MHz is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mali-G77 MC9 @ 800MHz is better: 3
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
