 |
Samsung Xclipse 920 at 500 MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 at 800 MHz |
|
GPU comparisons 05-06-2022
Full compare data of Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz which GPU is better. Maximum benchmark testing of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu v10, 9, GFXBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, and how good the GPU are in games Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG, Fortnite, Madout2, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which GPU is better to buy Samsung Xclipse 920 or Mali-G68 MC4.
Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz vs Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz comparison
| | |
|
| Spec | Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz |
Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz |
| Frequency | 500 MHz | 800 MHz | | Cores | 0 | 4 | | Shaders | 192 | 128 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | | Antutu v10 | 947568 | 509737 | | | | | GeekBench 6 | 39765 | 12756 | | | | | GFloPS | 2124 GFloPS | 686 GFloPS | | Triangle Fillrate | 1800 MT/s | 320 MT/s | | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GP/s | 12 GP/s | | DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Xclipse 920 @ 500MHz is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Mali-G68 MC4 @ 800MHz is better: 2
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both GPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
|
|
|
