|
AMD EPYC 7542 vs AMD EPYC 9454P |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD EPYC 7542 vs AMD EPYC 9454P tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing, programming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Furmark, RealBench, WPrime, 7zip, Prime95, VeraCrypt, 3DMark, Blender, Handbrake, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Gears 5, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Blender. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9454P or AMD EPYC 7542.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7542 | 67% |
EPYC 9454P | 73% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9454P is 8% better than EPYC 7542. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.EPYC 7542 | 76% |
EPYC 9454P | 80% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 134.8 | 142.3 | Valorant | 153.2 | 161.7 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 85.8 | 90.6 | Apex Legends | 144.0 | 152.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 114.9 | 121.3 | Overwatch | 124.1 | 131.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 105.7 | 111.6 | DOOM Eternal | 76.6 | 80.9 | Warzone | 119.5 | 126.2 | Assassin's Creed | 128.7 | 135.9 | Valheim | 127.1 | 134.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
EPYC 7542 | 16% |
EPYC 9454P | 17% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 9454P is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7542 since it has less power consumption: 225W vs. 290W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 9454P | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 174 | 213 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 7016 | 9744 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 419 | 421 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14867 | 20676 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 789 | 1073 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 38654 | 53807 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 9454P | Single-Core | 2227 | 2439 | Multi-Core | 56789 | 78937 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 9454P | Single-Core | 1098 | 1540 | Multi-Core | 45863 | 53258 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7542 |
AMD EPYC 9454P | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | November 10, 2022 | Type | Server | Server | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | Core name | Rome | Genoa | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | Generation | 2 | 4 | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Frequency | 2.9 MHz | 2.75 MHz | Cores | 32 | 48 | Threads | 64 | 96 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 225 W | 290 W | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 128MB | 256MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | 100-000000075 100-100000075WOF | 100-000000873 100-000000873WOF | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7542 is 5% better than EPYC 9454P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9454P has 16 more core than EPYC 7542. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7542 is better: 2
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9454P is better: 32 Although it should be realized that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of AMD EPYC 7542 and AMD EPYC 9454P before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7542 Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9454P Processor Comparisons • Vs EPYC 9124 • Vs EPYC 7F52 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 9334 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 9274F • Vs EPYC 9174F • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs EPYC 9454 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7F72 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 9554 • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs EPYC 9354 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs EPYC 9534 • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 9354P • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 9554P • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs EPYC 9654P • Vs EPYC 9374F • Vs EPYC 9254 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs EPYC 9634 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 9654 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 9224 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 9474F • Vs EPYC 7232P • Vs EPYC 7402 • Vs EPYC 7252 • Vs EPYC 7262 • Vs EPYC 7352 • Vs EPYC 7532 • Vs EPYC 7552 • Vs EPYC 7642 • Vs EPYC 7662 • Vs EPYC 7702P • Vs EPYC 7H12 • Vs EPYC 7373X • Vs Xeon Gold 5415+ • Vs Xeon Gold 6434 • Vs EPYC 7473X • Vs Xeon Gold 6434H • Vs EPYC 7573X • Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U • Vs Xeon Silver 4410T • Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y • Vs EPYC 7773X • Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H • Vs Xeon Gold 5416S • Vs Xeon Gold 6416H • Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
| |
|