 |
AMD EPYC 9454P vs AMD EPYC 7F52 |
|
Processor comparisons 15-03-2023
Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 9454P vs AMD EPYC 7F52 and see which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here is useful information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as PassMark, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, 3DMark, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, VeraCrypt, Prime95, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Blender, SuperPi, Blender, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, MATLAB, RealBench.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Death Stranding
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Fallout 76
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7F52 or AMD EPYC 9454P.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 9454P | 73% |
EPYC 7F52 | 63% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9454P is 13% better than EPYC 7F52. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 9454P | 80% |
EPYC 7F52 | 64% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Control, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 142.3 | 113.4 | | Valorant | 161.7 | 128.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 90.6 | 72.2 | | Apex Legends | 152.0 | 121.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 121.3 | 96.7 | | Overwatch | 131.0 | 104.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 111.6 | 88.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 80.9 | 64.4 | | Warzone | 126.2 | 100.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 135.9 | 108.3 | | Valheim | 134.2 | 107.0 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 9454P | 17% |
EPYC 7F52 | 17% |
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 213 | 123 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 9744 | 5347 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 421 | 236 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 20676 | 11340 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1073 | 593 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 53807 | 29500 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Single-Core | 2439 | 1342 | | Multi-Core | 78937 | 43275 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Single-Core | 1540 | 1253 | | Multi-Core | 53258 | 24926 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 9454P |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | | Announcement date | November 10, 2022 | April 14, 2020 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP5 | SP3 | | Core name | Genoa | Rome | | Architecture | Zen 4 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 4 | 2 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.9 MHz | | Frequency | 2.75 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Cores | 48 | 16 | | Threads | 96 | 32 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 54000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 290 W | 240 W | | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 4096 Gb | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 460.8 GB/s | 204.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | 100-000000873
100-000000873WOF | 100-000000140
100-000000140WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7F52 is 21% better than EPYC 9454P in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9454P has 32 more core than EPYC 7F52. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9454P is better: 30
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7F52 is better: 3
However, it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 9454P and AMD EPYC 7F52 before making a decision which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 9454P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 7F52 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
