 |
AMD EPYC 7532 vs AMD EPYC 9454P |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests AMD EPYC 7532 vs AMD EPYC 9454P and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, rendering, programming, machine learning, video editing. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, Furmark, AIDA64, WPrime, MATLAB, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, 7zip, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, RealBench, UserBenchmark, Prime95, Gears 5, 3DMark, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Dolphin Emulator.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9454P or AMD EPYC 7532.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| EPYC 7532 | 67% |
EPYC 9454P | 73% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9454P is 8% better than EPYC 7532. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| EPYC 7532 | 75% |
EPYC 9454P | 80% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 133.3 | 142.3 | | Valorant | 151.5 | 161.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 84.9 | 90.6 | | Apex Legends | 142.4 | 152.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 113.6 | 121.3 | | Overwatch | 122.7 | 131.0 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 104.6 | 111.6 | | DOOM Eternal | 75.8 | 80.9 | | Warzone | 118.2 | 126.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 127.3 | 135.9 | | Valheim | 125.8 | 134.2 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| EPYC 7532 | 19% |
EPYC 9454P | 17% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7532 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9454P as it consumes less power: 200W vs. 290W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD EPYC 7532 |
AMD EPYC 9454P | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 171 | 213 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6988 | 9744 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 415 | 421 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 14812 | 20676 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 785 | 1073 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 38514 | 53807 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7532 |
AMD EPYC 9454P | | Single-Core | 2217 | 2439 | | Multi-Core | 56494 | 78937 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD EPYC 7532 |
AMD EPYC 9454P | | Single-Core | 1146 | 1540 | | Multi-Core | 44451 | 53258 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD EPYC 7532 |
AMD EPYC 9454P | | Announcement date | October 01, 2020 | November 10, 2022 | | Type | Server | Server | | Socket | SP3 | SP5 | | Core name | Rome | Genoa | | Architecture | Zen 2 | Zen 4 | | Generation | 2 | 4 | | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 2.75 MHz | | Cores | 32 | 48 | | Threads | 64 | 96 | | Bus rate | | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 64000 millions | 64000 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 200 W | 290 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR5 | | Max. Memory | | 4096 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | | 460.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 256MB | 256MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | Yes | | Part number | 100-000000136
100-000000136WOF | 100-000000873
100-000000873WOF |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 9454P is 12% better than EPYC 7532 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9454P has 16 more core than EPYC 7532. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7532 is better: 1
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9454P is better: 32
However, it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7532 and AMD EPYC 9454P before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7532 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 9454P Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
|
|
|
